@snder 500 is fine most of the time, sometimes i'm over and have to split up or shorten because it's like 550 ;) So, 500 is fine, but I would not complain if it would be like 600 XD
Sometimes I'm missing exactly one word, so even a small upgrade to 600 would be nice!
@snder yes moar! Oh at least 777. Maybe 999? I have a lot of dumb inconsequential shit to post about my feelings and personal life and I don't want to have to cut out any lewdness, violence, or esp any very lewd violence
@snder Sometimes i need more, i don't see how microblogging is ruined by allowing more expressiveness, 1000 would be enough.
I have aslo (sometimes) surpassed the 500 barrier, so be it!
@snder So far it's a tight race!
@oldtowneast Indeed haha! That makes this not easies for me :P
@snder I prefer a shorter limit. Birdsite has taught me to keep things succinct. Get to the point, and pump as much meaning in how you phrase and type and punctuate. And if you need to make other points, thread it out. It.. helps to prevent ranting.
@snder Wow the tides have certainly turned! I wonder if URLs or image links not counting towards the limit would have made more people vote for "500 is Good"
@snder I think 150 characters invites you to be so creative when trying to express your thoughts. 500 for me is so much. Does 500 kills the micro blogging experience?
We are quey.org! We are a generalistic and moderated Mastodon instance for people of all colours and sizes. No ads, no tracking just be free.